She is the programme lead for the long-running Front End Engineering & Design initiative, working with the leading biopharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) across their global portfolio of projects.

We need that hope and the energy that curiosity brings to imagine and realise the solutions..Professor John Dyson spent more than 25 years at GlaxoSmithKline, eventually ending his career as VP, Head of Capital Strategy and Design, where he focussed on developing a long-term strategic approach to asset management..

While there, he engaged Bryden Wood and together they developed the Front End Factory, a collaborative endeavour to explore how to turn purpose and strategy into the right projects – which paved the way for Design to Value.He is committed to the betterment of lives through individual and collective endeavours.. As well as his business and pharmaceutical experience, Dyson is Professor of Human Enterprise at the University of Birmingham, focussing on project management, business strategy and collaboration.. Additionally, he is a qualified counsellor with a private practice and looks to bring the understanding of human behaviour into business and projects.. To learn more about our Design to Value philosophy, read Design to Value: The architecture of holistic design and creative technology by Professor John Dyson, Mark Bryden, Jaimie Johnston MBE and Martin Wood.Available to purchase at.Unveiling the advantages of reference design with Bryden Wood.

Learn about our innovative approach to design and construction through our video, 'What are the benefits of reference design'.Jaimie Johnston MBE.

, Head of Global Systems, as he discusses the concept of reference design and its pivotal role in transforming major construction programmes.. Key takeaways:.

Understanding reference design:.If our objective is to replace enough dirty energy with clean energy in time for us to decarbonise and avert the worst consequences of global warming, we need to close down as many dirty energy sources as possible and replace them with clean energy sources.

Specifically, we need to decarbonisecoal plants, as at current rates, coal plants will use up all of the available CO. 2. budget by themselves.. 3.It is really not a question any more of comparing different types of energy production but, instead, a matter of comparing different portfolios of energy production that are able to produce the energy required with significantly lower carbon emissions, and that can also be implemented quickly enough.

The question is whether to do so we need an energy production portfolio without nuclear power, or one that includes nuclear energy.And so, in this case, the question ‘is nuclear energy renewable?’ may be less important than ‘can nuclear power help us tackle the climate crisis?’.